An Anders brief must provide references to both legal precedent and pages in the record to demonstrate why there are no arguable grounds to be advan..

Do tell me how a Pro Se defendant is able to review the record without access to read the transcript? If his "court appointed attorney", "the trial court" or the "appellate court" does nor provide a "true and correct copy" of the record.?




Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he has concluded that the appeal presents no legally non-frivolous question. (1) Appellant's brief meets the requirements of Anders. (2) Counsel has informed the Court that he notified appellant of the following: (1) after reviewing the record, he found no meritorious issues for appeal; (2) he is requesting to withdraw as counsel; and (3) appellant has the right to review the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. (3) Counsel has forwarded appellant a copy of the Anders brief and a copy of his motion to withdraw as attorney of record. More than thirty days have passed, and appellant has not filed any pro se brief. Is appellant "legally trained"?